There is a face over the top of the video before Elizabeth appears and after she disappears. It is the distorted voice in the audio. We don’t know if the image speaking matches the distorted video or not…I tend not to ‘assume’ in these mysteries.
1 Like
OK, that’s like an alien head, but the mouth doesn’t move so it’s impossible to get any lip reading.
I’ll try to convert the video and upload it to youtube and provide a link. You’ll see that the “face” is indeed talking and moving its head. The eyes and eyebrows are larger than humanly normal…with leads me to think it is similar to what we see in part of the Emily video.
Yes, big eyes, it’s like an alien, but the mouth doesn’t really talk, it’s just loads of distortion, so basically impossible for a lip reading.
edit: here’s a gif
5 Likes
Thanks for your efforts, I feel I’m in the same boat as you…where did you put the oars??
Where is that image from?
These RTTY signals sound like the ones you get when you activate the tall mast waypoints in no mans sky when it zooms out really far
Probably way off, but I think it almost looks like a blank ‘template’ of a human face.
It changes in each video. I is talking, just not wide-open mouth. More like soft-spoken or whispers.
I suck at video conversion (used VirtualDUB) so this video sucks…but demos the idea.
3 Likes
Has someone tried barcode yet? (sorry if it’s been covered already, I cannot read all the posts at the moment).
Barcodes, at least the encoding I’m familiar with, use an alternating sequence of black and white bars, each being either thin or thick. Thin represents a 0, thick a 1. The important thing is that both black and white bars encode a binary digit.
The pattern posted above by ewrk doesn’t look like a barcode, because the ‘bars’ and gaps have more than two distinct widths. I’m seeing widths of 1, 2, 3 and 4 repeated throughout the picture.
1 Like
You should overlay this video on top of the 3 Elizabeth L. videos from the 1st 3 sequences. I think there are going to be more of these videos to come. Sounds like a message was embedded in the video. i think they are using the Superlumina/Echo method to send the message, We’re not seeing the whole message cause it is echoing; one echo to each video. After all the echos get to us and are combined we should see the whole message.
A failed experiment but I’ll show my working:
I converted the vertical bars in the spectrogram into a series of binary digits, by treating a coloured bar as a “1” and an empty space as a “0”.
I didn’t do anything sophisticated, I just overlaid a grid on the image and adjusted its spacing to fit the distance between the vertical bars, then used this to count numbers of coloured and black bars.
So the first part of the image (reading from the left) decodes to 10010011011011000110110001100110110010
Sadly converting this binary to ASCII results in gibberish. I tried splitting into 8 bit bytes at all possible places (padding with leading 0s as required).
Oh and if that doesn’t work try just over laying the audio.
just for clarification, this is the new emily video from the NYC live drop twitch feed?
I know but if you listen to both you can here where they sound like the can line up.
I tried fooling around with Baudot code, but using the length of the blocks gave values larger than five (largest was 9)
1 31
2 72
3 68
4 39
5 6
6 2
7 3
8 2
9 1
STOP 30 (double space)
Using instead 0 (space) and 1 (mark), where audio is 1 and silence 0 (pretty much like the bars - in some places the bars fall off or are weak enough not to show in the entire spectrum), you get:
NOTE: I screwed the script up somehow, and I now see it has measured some of the bits too short, and so anything beneath is inaccurate!
01110110110110111101101111011101101110011111111011101101101110111101101110111010011110011101101101101110111110011011101110011011101011110111011111011011101110110111001101101110101101101110011101100101110101110111101011101101011101111011011110111101011011001110110111011101011101100110111011101110111010111101110111101110111011011110011110110011110011011110101010110111111101011110110110011110011011011101110101100111011011111110110110101101111011101111011011100101110111001101111101101011110110011110111111011110111101100111101111010111111101110111101101100111110010111011110101110111101011111011101101101111011110110101101110110111011100111011011110010110111101110110110111101110110011110101110010110111011110101110110111011101011101110111011011011011011101110111010011101101101101111011111111101111011011111101111101011101111111100110111011101101101101100100111101110111011110
I tried decoding these on http://www.dcode.fr/baudot-code , adding zeroes at the start and end to see differing outputs. Yields… nothing useful.
That the intervals are so precise is to me an indicator that something is hidden in there, but I’m not savvy enough and don’t have the tools required.
Edit: So for example,
01110 11011 01101 11101 10111 10111 01101 11001 11111 11011 10110 11011 10111 10110 11101 11010 01111 00111 01101 10110 11101 11110 01101 11011 10011 01110 10111 10111 01111 10110 11101 11011 01110 01101 10111 01011 01101 11001 11011 00101 11010 11101 11101 01110 11010 11101 11101 10111 10111 10101 10110 01110 11011 10111 01011 10110 01101 11011 10111 01110 10111 10111 01111 01110 11101 10111 10011 11011 00111 10011 01111 01010 10110 11111 11010 11110 11011 00111 10011 01101 11011 10101 10011 10110 11111 11011 01101 01101 11101 11011 11011 01110 01011 10111 00110 11111 01101 01111 01100 11110 11111 10111 10111 10110 01111 01111 01011 11111 01110 11110 11011 00111 11001 01110 11110 10111 01111 01011 11101 11011 01101 11101 11101 10101 10111 01101 11011 10011 10110 11110 01011 01111 01110 11011 01111 01110 11001 11101 01110 01011 01110 11110 10111 01101 11011 10101 11011 10111 01101 10110 11011 10111 01110 10011 10110 11011 01111 01111 11111 01111 01101 11111 01111 10101 11011 11111 10011 01110 11101 10110 11011 00100 11110 11101 11011 11000
Yields
ITA2 (msb):
C⇧!/11!?⇩⇧0⇧10/&(7!0/=!⇧2:11(0/⇧:!1␇!?⇧'&//:&//1160:⇧1␇0!⇧1:11(:/12⇧72(40⇩GV⇧72!⇧620⇩⇧!!/⇧⇧:␇18⇩FKNV⇩QQPKKJ⇩CV⇧7?:=1(␇/⇧!//61!⇧20=␇(:⇧(:?/:␇:=1!⇧6⇧1!0⇧1:20⇧((⇩KF⇩KY⇧⇩WCXP⇧ =/⇧9
… which is not exactly readable.
3 Likes
I have the same feeling about the intervals…it seems their duration is quantised…there must be something hidden…
2 Likes
Citizen scientists, I don’t know if it has been brought up to your attention but the last part of the last message on the forum before Emily disappearance is:
Maybe it’s important, maybe not… 
3 Likes
SX-28 info on the radio