This is what I got from replacing:
‌ 200B 0
‍ 200C 1
‬ 202C 2
 FEFF 3
01
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 2 0
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 1
00000 3 1 0
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 1 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 0 2 2
00000 3 0 2
00000 3 0 1
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 1
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 0 2 2
02
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 1 3
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 1 0
00000 3 1 1
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 1 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 0 2 2
00000 3 0 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 1 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 0 2 2
00000 3 0 2
00000 3 0 3
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 1 1
00000 3 1 1
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 0 2 2
03
00000 3 0 1
00000 3 1 1
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 3
00000 3 0 2
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 0 2 2
00000 3 0 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 2
00000 3 1 1
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 0 2 2
00000 3 0 2
00000 3 0 3
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 1 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 0 2 2
04
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 1 0
00000 3 2 0
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 0 2 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 1 3
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 1
00000 3 1 1
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 0 2 2
00000 3 0 1
00000 3 1 1
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 1
00000 3 1 3
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 1 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 2 0 0
00000 0 2 2
05
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 3
00000 3 0 3
00000 3 2 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 0 0
06
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 0 1
00000 2 3 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 1 3
00000 2 3 1
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 1 2
00000 2 3 2
00000 3 0 0
00000 3 1 3
3 Likes
Are you just looking at frequency here?
Not frequency, plain replacement. All start with 5 times ‌, which has lowest hex value, so replaced by 0.
The next hex value representing ‍ is replaced by a 1 and so on.
They all share the same start of a total of 8 characters. So the last 3 characters are where they differ. Just easier to see this way, although not sure where to go with this yet.
1 Like
OK, thanks. Bit clearer for me.
Hard to believe this is my 30th Waking Titan report this year alone, and we still aren’t done yet!
Edit: Video moved to top post.
3 Likes
If that were the case (and I’m not denying it’s possible), what are the statistical chances that all those cumulative errors would be:
a) Grouped together in coherent blocks,
b) All in different patterns, and;
b) All invisible in HTML?
I think it’s far more likely that they’re deliberately included
@DevilinPixy Do you think it’s credible that those could be base-4 numbers?
Credible yes, as noted already. Let me convert the first reply to base4 to then use decimal values as Ascii:
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 2 0 56
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 1 49
00000 3 1 0 52
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 1 0 52
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 0 2 2 10
00000 3 0 2 50
00000 3 0 1 49
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 1 49
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 0 2 2 10
Decimal
48 56 58 49 52 58 52 48 10 50 49 58 49 48 58 48 48 10
Ascii
08:14:40 21:10:00
3 Likes
Yea I know I saw it before, but was curious to know what you thought of it… yup those are the times I saw as well
1 Like
Not sure what to think yet, but it does match ascii pretty damn well. I am just wondering how it would differ if using a different substitution, would it still look like times, just diff?
I have not been following the Discord this time around, so I am on my own. I will convert the rest and see the full results, then see what this could possibly mean.
By the way, Emily is editing one of her posts on Reddit:
2 Likes
I don’t know if the ascii changed in Emily’s edited version, but here it is @Polyphemus
65 110 100 32 121 111 117 39 114 101 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 239 187 191 226 128 140 226 128 140 32 116 111 111 32 115 104 97 114 112 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 239 187 191 226 128 140 226 128 141 32 116 111 32 98 101 32 117 115 101 100 10 10 79 114 32 121 111 117 39 114 101 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 172 239 187 191 226 128 172 32 116 111 111 32 115 104 111 99 107 101 100 32 102 114 111 109 32 98 101 105 110 103 32 117 115 101 100 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 239 187 191 226 128 140 226 128 140 32 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 239 187 191 226 128 141 226 128 172 32 66 121 32 116 104 101 115 101 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 172 239 187 191 226 128 141 32 98 117 108 108 121 105 110 103 32 99 104 105 108 100 114 101 110 32 111 102 32 116 104 101 32 102 97 98 117 108 111 117 115 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 239 187 191 226 128 140 226 128 140 10 10 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 239 187 191 226 128 141 226 128 172 82 97 102 102 108 105 110 103 32 111 102 102 32 108 105 109 105 116 101 100 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 172 239 187 191 226 128 172 32 101 100 105 116 105 111 110 32 115 104 111 101 115 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 239 187 191 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 226 128 140 239 187 191 226 128 141 226 128 172
1 Like
Odd. This is what I got (decimal):
And you’re too sharp to be used
Or you’re too shocked from being used By these bullying children of the fabulous
Raffling off limited edition shoes
065 110 100 121 111 117 039 114 101 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 65279 8204 8204 116 111 111 115 104 097 114 112 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 65279 8204 8205 116 111 098 101 117 115 101 100
079 114 121 111 117 039 114 101 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 8236 65279 8236 116 111 111 115 104 111 099 107 101 100 102 114 111 109 098 101 105 110 103 117 115 101 100 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 65279 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 65279 8205 8236 066 121 116 104 101 115 101 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 8236 65279 8205 098 117 108 108 121 105 110 103 099 104 105 108 100 114 101 110 111 102 116 104 101 102 097 098 117 108 111 117 115 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 65279 8204 8204
8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 65279 8205 8236 082 097 102 102 108 105 110 103 111 102 102 108 105 109 105 116 101 100 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 8236 65279 8236 101 100 105 116 105 111 110 115 104 111 101 115 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 65279 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 8204 65279 8205
2 Likes
It looks like your software is breaking down large numbers into smaller numbers in the acceptable Ascii code range.
Possibly why you weren’t seeing any anomalies.
1 Like
Possibly. But we need a new analysis for the first post regardless. The spacing chars changed. They say that the first line should have a 6 instead of a 7 now… yikes
1 Like
Ok, here are all of them with replacement and conversion:
‌ 200B 0
‍ 200C 1
‬ 202C 2
 FEFF 3
01
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 2 0 56
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 1 49
00000 3 1 0 52
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 1 0 52
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 0 2 2 10
00000 3 0 2 50
00000 3 0 1 49
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 1 49
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 0 2 2 10
decimal
48 56 58 49 52 58 52 48 10 50 49 58 49 48 58 48 48 10
ascii
08:14:40
21:10:00
02
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 1 3 55
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 1 0 52
00000 3 1 1 53
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 1 0 52
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 0 2 2 10
00000 3 0 2 50
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 1 0 52
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 0 2 2 10
00000 3 0 2 50
00000 3 0 3 51
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 1 1 53
00000 3 1 1 53
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 0 2 2 10
decimal
48 55 58 52 53 58 52 48 10 50 48 58 52 48 58 48 48 10 50 51 58 53 53 58 48 48 10
ascii
07:45:40
20:40:00
23:55:00
03
00000 3 0 1 49
00000 3 1 1 53
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 3 51
00000 3 0 2 50
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 0 2 2 10
00000 3 0 2 50
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 2 50
00000 3 1 1 53
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 0 2 2 10
00000 3 0 2 50
00000 3 0 3 51
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 1 0 52
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 0 2 2 10
decimal
49 53 58 51 50 58 48 48 10 50 48 58 50 53 58 48 48 10 50 51 58 52 48 58 48 48 10
ascii
15:32:00
20:25:00
23:40:00
04
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 1 0 52
00000 3 2 0 56
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 0 2 2 10
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 1 3 55
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 1 49
00000 3 1 1 53
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 2 50
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 0 2 2 10
00000 3 0 1 49
00000 3 1 1 53
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 1 49
00000 3 1 3 55
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 1 0 52
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 2 0 0 32
00000 0 2 2 10
decimal
48 48 58 52 56 58 48 48 10 48 55 58 49 53 58 50 48 10 49 53 58 49 55 58 52 48 32 10
ascii
00:48:00
07:15:20
15:17:40
05
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 3 51
00000 3 0 3 51
00000 3 2 2 58
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 0 0 48
decimal
48 48 58 51 51 58 48 48
ascii
00:33:00
06
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 0 1 49
00000 2 3 2 46
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 1 3 55
00000 2 3 1 45
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 1 2 54
00000 2 3 2 46
00000 3 0 0 48
00000 3 1 3 55
decimal
48 49 46 48 55 45 48 54 46 48 55
ascii
01.07-06.07
All decimal combined:
48 56 58 49 52 58 52 48 10 50 49 58 49 48 58 48 48 10 48 55 58 52 53 58 52 48 10 50 48 58 52 48 58 48 48 10 50 51 58 53 53 58 48 48 10 49 53 58 51 50 58 48 48 10 50 48 58 50 53 58 48 48 10 50 51 58 52 48 58 48 48 10 48 48 58 52 56 58 48 48 10 48 55 58 49 53 58 50 48 10 49 53 58 49 55 58 52 48 32 10 48 48 58 51 51 58 48 48 48 49 46 48 55 45 48 54 46 48 55
ascii
08:14:40
21:10:00
07:45:40
20:40:00
23:55:00
15:32:00
20:25:00
23:40:00
00:48:00
07:15:20
15:17:40
00:33:0001.07-06.07
4 Likes
This is starting to hurt my head.
5 Likes
I am sorry @Polyphemus 
Considering I used the Reddit replies in order from top to bottom on the comments page sorted by latest, I’d basically have to reverse them:
6)
01.07-06.07
5)
00:33:00
4)
00:48:00
07:15:20
15:17:40
3)
15:32:00
20:25:00
23:40:00
2)
07:45:40
20:40:00
23:55:00
1)
08:14:40
21:10:00
2 Likes
That looks like a date indeed, from July 1st till July 6th, followed by times.
I can imagine we will have to work together and capture satellite transmissions during the above date range at given times.
1 Like