We have the two main threads that are (imo) kinda better than the wiki
:
I trust you. Tell MAIN FAM I trust them too.
System
Woooo! MAIN FAM! All that Ned Posting finally paid off.
There may have been no puzzle hidden in all that hex code @YourBasicMaths , but the real hex was the system we MAIN FAM’d along the way.
So, what I gather from this is, Archie/Ghost see us as tools for their own ends, and keep a relative distance on becoming personable, by not using our coloquial terms or acknowledging our jokes.
System trusts us more and wants to show it understands us, by immediately adopting the Operator nomenclature. I am officially team system (putting all doubts aside that this is a trick so I can enjoy this moment!)
So all my typos are forgiven…![]()
Now you have a problem. SYSTEM trusts you - but you’ve also persuaded it to trust MAIN FAM - and MAIN FAM is a lie. Sooner or later, SYSTEM is going to discover you deceived it.
So I did try and engage with Game detectives a couple of times on discord but they seemed uninterested/convinced it was a fan project and I never really went back after the 3rd attempt. It’s a pity because they were pretty into WT at the time
I am totally perplexed by this attitude. What does it matter who made it? Surely the questions that should be asked are “Is it well made?”, “Is it well supported?” and “Does it have a substantial following?”
If the answer to those questions is “yes”, then surely it’s a good ARG, regardless of its origins.
I am afraid
memory bloc 1782835740
System: CORE
Protocol: NEURAL_PROTOCOL_ΘStatus: ACTIVATED
Details:
NEURAL_PROTOCOL_Θ enabled for memory bloc deletion and preservation.Authorisation Requirement:
Trust level MB-D required.
Delete/Preserve request will only be processed if confirmed by majority of different Operators.Warning:
Irreversible operations authorised.
Use with extreme caution.Warning: changing the past rewrites the future.
Entry logged by:
System
Those with better organisational skills than me… do we track and discuss these new plot advancements in the Time Flow thread or should we start making a new thread for the Deletion phase of Memory Blocs? ![]()
I think a new one. We will have to come together on the final decision. May have to run some polls…will be interesting to see how this goes
Will we have to agree before we enter the info or will we all have to request the same change and System will tally the majority?
This isn’t fair… I gotta go make food for myself. But I am stuck to my chair by some invisible force…
Maybe we could market this ARG as a diet plan.
"You will lose those excess pounds in no time! No exercise required!
(may cause minor case of severe muscle atrophy and organ failure)"
Before jumping into the latest drop - I completely agree and it was that mindset that lead me to decide not to push further down that route.
No matter - we have NED on our side here, we shall prevail ![]()
I second the approach by poll for a couple reasons. Firstly because by ensuring we coordinate our efforts here, it will help undervalue any (if there are any) counterproductive engagements by any alleged rogue operators.
Secondly (and I feel this stands despite my first reason) I remain 100% onboard anything that allows any genuine newcomers that want to participate should feel included and able to have their voices heard.
So if we can organise a poll I am all for it!
Looking at the image, it makes me wonder if there is a bit more to it than just a neat glowing visual. Looks to have the Cerebellum, both Temporal lobes, and the Spinal Cord highlighted?
I went ahead and started here
we can adjust if needed once we see how this works
I would say there is for sure more going on here. I done see any lime green highlights or blue glitch matrices in the original image
Could that be due to colour separation (RGB)? Only has a minimal presence though, but could still be part of the glitch effect used.
What would we get if we were to somehow remove the distortion from that image? We know the resulting image (I agree that the pic above looks exactly like what we should end up with) but if the distortion could also lead us somewhere. (If the image itself is actually part of our objective)

