I’m sorry… I just can’t help but LOL. 
They can’t even spell RESOURCE right! :smh:
Here is a quick look at what I have best speeds disregarding location
U/D/P
31422 - 41/75/2
91247 - 32/67/2
11986 - 32/63/4
67240 - 32/72/7
85671 - 51/97/3
88014 - 51/88/3
73195 - 35/66/4
40144 - 36/58/8
55197 - 28/59/3
60206 - 29/64/8
Updated for typos and new info
2 Likes
If he left any notes for Myraid/V/-RE to use on us… so help me, I won’t hold back putting him inside a pit of ravenous hamsters. -_-
1 Like
For those who’ve not yet seen them,
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10ehx7fE2oE-5Vlyc7mmxraXolGTbsxr4j_jeFu03oGo/edit#gid=0
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15DpRA95K1lok0aN-H7sWC3ZYWz3Q8RxWDDG7WP4MYAE/edit#gid=0
The spreadsheets have been updated with new data, and the best of each server highlighted
4 Likes
Where does it come from ? And some values are different from the google sheet (i.e 91247 is 31/66/2 if us EAST)
It came from my fat fingers on this phone, lol - I’ll need to update with the new US west as well
Updated the other post - they are just the best numbers disregarding location, not the overall best server speeds
3 Likes
I made a mistake in that count unfortunately, I think this is correct:
1-5 (12., :2, 15a, 2b, 18c, 19d, 36e, 2f, 6g, 7h, 11i, 2k, 6l, 6m, 12n, 11o, 6p, 11r, 25s, 10t, 4u, 7v, 1w, 13x, 4y) 248
2-7 (12., :2, 13a, 2b, 16c, 15d, 33e, 2f, 4g, 7h, 9i, 2k, 8l, 7m, 13n, 13o, 5p, 13r, 22s, 12t, 6u, 5v, 12x, 4y) 237
3-10 (12., 19a, 2b, 18c, 14d, 36e, 4g, 7h, 10i, 2k, 9l, 9m, 10n, 12o, 9p, 10r, 26s, 11t, 4u, 5v, 12x, 7y) 248
4-8 (12., 20a, 2b, 20c, 14d, 39e, 1f, 4g, 5h, 6i, 2k, 9l, 7m, 14n, 11o, 11p, 11r, 25s, 7t, 6u, 3v, 2w, 12x, 4y) 247
5-1 (12., 2:, 19a, 2b, 19c, 14d, 36e, 1f, 6g, 5h, 12i, 2k, 4l, 9m, 13n, 11o, 6p, 11r, 26s, 11t, 5u, 8v, 1w, 14x, 4y) 253
3 Likes
Did you saw that a pair is really different from the 4 others ?
31422 - 41/75/2 (Australia) with 85671 - 51/97/3 (Europe)
91247 - 31/66/2 (US east) with 73195 - 35/66/4 (US east)
11986 - 32/63/4 (S America) with 60206 - 29/64/8 (S America)
88014 - 51/88/9 (Australia) with 55197 - 28/55/6 (Australia)
67240 - 32/72/7 (US west) with 40144 - 36/58/8 (US west)
Only this pair have 2 different locations for their best connections.
3 Likes
I tried using the best speeds in a straight up numerical substitution cipher, using the FetchData from the same server, nothing jumped out at me.
1 Like
OMG, @johnnycloud … >_<
You mean the typical Author of the materials is Known to you?!
… AND he’s a Registered Member of ETARC…?
Just when I’m still less than 3-days-freshly-new . . . 
I can’t help it – it’s the Grammar Nartsee (sic) in me! 
1 Like
When I saw this one, @kerdorin, I just figured on a “simple” typo of @SingularGleam’s
46724 == 67240 server 
1 Like
TBH, I would’ve expected more Ts than Xs. (Thinking of Morse, here…)
Many Es make sense, actually. Sufficient Vowels also makes sense.
Few Bs, Fs, Ks, Ps and end-alphabet letters (besides X) makes a lot of sense, too.
** PS @hilightnotes – last row : 6-9 instead, possibly? **
If we “borrowed” Scrabble’s Starting Tile Set (for distribution of Letters, rather than my earlier suggestion to look at Tile Points), we see v quickly that 10pt letters (Q,Z) are “rare” – indeed, they are Non-existent throughout all 10 datasets here; and 8pt letters (J,X) are v. uncommon … J doesn’t appear, but X is rather plentiful.
Let’s pause a moment and talk about:
NEXT
EXITs
EXOSUITs
GALAXY / GALAXIES
and not forgetting the KORVAX…
… and suddenly we have far more EXcuses to be finding the letter X…
So, suddenly I’m thinking “WE HAVE ALL THE LETTERS WE NEED”
We just have to UN-JUMBLE them somehow…
2 Likes
For those using the data from the fetchdata are you removing or including the chr(10) new line code ?
60206 17,35,52,71,85,102,121
73195 17,33,50,69,83,102,117
11986 17,35,53,72,89,108,125
40144 17,31,48,67,85,101,120
67240 17,31,52,69,88,106,125
88014 18,36,51,70,89,109,128
55197 18,36,55,70,89,104,123
31422 18,37,52,71,87,106,121
91247 18,38,55,73,87,106,118
85671 18,37,52,67,86,106,125
I’ve missed most of this being at work so started playing with some VBA to find them.
Has anyone tried the UCP type of matching ?
Not to my knowledge - is that Visual Basic you are talking about? If so it’s out of my hands.
I see your "18, . . . . "s and I raise you:
18,446,744,073,709,551,616
[Edit]
For SOME of you, this number will stand out.
Suffice to be said, I had to look the bloody thing up, to get it exactly right.
[/edit]
1 Like
Why is the ‘Best’ ping value missing on the updated version?
Sadly I think it’s been determined there aren’t that many planets in the game…not that we’d ever be able to tell normally…there’s still more there than we’ll see in a lifetime…I think it’s something like trillions of solar systems per galaxy or something like that.