I do understand why the mods need to do what they need to do but sometimes they do make mistakes and donât fully understand when something is or isnât related to the ARG.
I thought the sudden slam down on chatter related to the Little Prince was a bit of an overstep as most of it was in relation to the Memorial terminal message and how it relates to the current phase of being assigned stars.
Most of the questions were people wondering where they could look to find out more about the Themes in The Little Prince and the parallels to the current ARG narrative and most of the replies were to send those people in the right direction or Operators happily announcing they just ordered a copy for their family etc.
There werenât too many tangents and it was quite communal. Iâve certainly seen the conversation go off completely left field and become a flood of back and forth unrelated messages a lot worse than what was displayed last night.
I got 2 warnings early on when I wasnât really entirely sure on what was accepted discussion within the channel, and I also got one warning for something that was totally on board but seemed to be from the mod not understanding the context. But in all cases I didnât push back, and even in the one where I knew I wasnât out of line, I felt extremely embarrassed like I had dragged poop into the house.
So I just try my best to keep things in check and if Iâm joking around I try not to let it spiral (this for me is the hardest thing to combat against, I can take a joke theory and run with it a little too far some times)
But from the mods perspective they saw chatter of a book and so I can see how they may have thought this could have been one of those unrelated ARG instances.
Iâve just learned not to go into any lore or theorising in there in general related to PSS narrative. They would prefer we do all of that in the NMS lore channel, even if itâs PSS related.
ETARC ultimately might be the more suitable place to go deep into that stuff though, so as not to get gunty or a mod on your case.

