Fantastic, heading there now. Thanks for the heads up
It sure does ![]()
An absolutely beautiful planet.
edit: Just came back from there; happened upon a cadmium hotspot, will build a small, respectful base. Also happened to be there the same time as āStuā - same guy who competes with āDolphinā to discover as many systems as possible? Iād like to think so.
Welcome back @P0nestream
Thnx. Its hard to stay away, now with this ARG and all ![]()
Où va-t-on?
Quand on nāa plus de maison?
Les fleurs sous le bƩton,
Maman,
Dis-le-moi,
Où va-t-on?
Est-ce quāon finit par voir ce quāon assemble?
That was you! I was tripping out when I saw your corvette. And you standing there like an NPC waiting to give me a quest. I had never seen āhappinessā in the game before and began wondering if you were the Architect ![]()
The system containing Tucson also contains the same planets found in the holographic chart projector. Kusamoto had been searching for months for such a system when he happened upon this one.
A holographic mystery?
That was the holographic mystery, yeah. Iām sure of it
Welcome @Falkon and @stubbornducky !
New post!
Marsh and Cicero were both in the data we found on The Wasp, which means⦠sigh⦠weāre still trying to solve The Wasp.
The new posts seem to describe how to make hollogramsā¦do we need to recreate something using the technique?
OR! Is this a nod to when we had to do the Atlas logo inside an atlas logo, whatever that was called at the time?
Can we recreate the nodes on the system page from a different perspective?
In Memoriam is now stable! 2016_dataset ā project-skyscraper
Iām still not sure what we did, but I hope this means we can put The Wasp to rest.
Does the date (October 30th, 2016) actually match the event described (AK finding the system matching the holographic projector)?
I initially assumed that, since AK joined in 2017, the event described couldnāt have actually been from 2016, and this timestamp should be ascribed to the Galactic Hub Founding. Is that correct? If so, super weird that itās stable, but maybe āstableā doesnāt mean āaccurateā. Very interesting.





