I look forward to an Andrew type android (Bicentennial Man) help me as I toddle about in my old age. Learns how to be more more helpful. I like it. Just so long as the “serve and obey” parameters are locked.
I wouldn’t like an iRobot type screw up due to a master AI influence. Nasty!
Yes, its sci-fi but so much in our current life echoes futuristic dreams from the past.
Where’s my damn flying car tho!!!
I want my flying car!!!
Although on second thoughts; a traffic crash would be a lot more serious at 2000mtrs.
Sorry…got distracted… aaaaaarrrrrgggghhh *!
1 Like
Not really, all innovations should be given thought to safeguards before they are thrown into the public. Waiting for a problem to occur seems incredibly naive to me. That’s why extensive testing phases are used.
That is sometimes referred to as very narrow AI.
3 Likes
Well, we got this quote from Rick Cook to sum it all up:
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
The real question is, does that mean an AI will fail/be broken by users? Or does it mean we won’t stand a chance? ^^
4 Likes
As I was reading your comment I was thinking " I better mention idiocracy in my response."
Then I got to the end XD
1 Like