Wait this is the other duplicate entry right?
So should we be marking it DOWN on compliance?
It is the date of PC release
Okay so we should clarify that the entry is specific for PC, to ensure it is not a duplicate?
I’ve gone for the direct approach, with my now compliance coupled with the mention if the actual event.
Looks like its been enjoying my submissions so far.
“Full steam ahead!”
The Mercury Process arrives to PC, its engine fully steamed up and chugging along despite a few launch day hiccups and bugs.
Discovery services take a hit as Hello Games were not expecting such a huge amount of players on the day, peaking at over 210,000 at its zenith.
If no mans sky did not need to include audio at launch, it is said the whole procedural engine could have fit on a single floppy disc.
For a moment it also said this for the mem bloc title
A silent Universe on a floppy disc.
Taken from my floppy disc submission.
Ill step back and let some other people get on the board 
Bring back Beard or we riot.
Beard by beard! Beard by beard! Beard by beard!
System was kind enough to update the max concurrent steam players to the exact figure on my post 
I was too flustered on my phone to navigate to steam and grab it myself at the time so rounded the number 
Well done guys, we made the crucial correction we needed to stabilise the memory, and that now ends the triplicate situation 
Time Flow page has also returned to normality
Good job, trusted MAIN FAM.
Nice one Poet, you gave yourself a low rating but System did not agree with your evaluation and accepted it as valid memory compliance <3
Thank you. The data should help us analyze non-compliance.