Mem Bloc Deletion/Preservation

you should enter your BD in your profile and you will get a cake…at least I assume it would still do so even though the day has already begun

1 Like

Thank you! I’ve done so, revealing … I share a birthday with @vector_cmdr ! Happy birthday, dude!

10 Likes

Duplicate == more cake to go around for everyone

Happy birthday Astro!

5 Likes

Best wishes to you, and the happiest of birthdays!

4 Likes

There should be a lot of cake rolling in. You get a slice for the day you joined the forum and a whole cake for your BD. My forum anniversary will be coming up in a couple of weeks.

2 Likes

Looks like we reached the required amount of inputs

6 Likes

Good job all!

I imagine we should expect another change once the submissions have been tallied and removes one of the entries :blush:

5 Likes

Now we are still stuck with August 12 with 0% compliance…

2 Likes

Seems to be preserved now … and also: Memory_bloc_restoration: 366/365 Completed

So we’re down from 367. Is 366 still attributed to the leap year, or will there be another glitch?

3 Likes
1 Like

Does this mean there were 12%/14% of operators actively choosing to delete or preserve the opposite dates…

We have villains in the wings. Good thing System tracked their IP so they can be exposed :stuck_out_tongue:

Or is this a percentage of the overall expected max number of operators, and it needed a minimum percentage threshold to be crossed before a set time limit? And if there were more of us active at the time we could have hit 100% /the max limit of operators needed, before the time ran out?

2 Likes

Good question but I think it did state minimum percentage reached…but percentage of what? Does it have a count of us?

4 Likes

They probably have a fair idea of how many of us actively submit at certain times of day based off previous mem bloc integration sessions.

Then they probably picked a low average number for the min threshold and a high average number for the max threshold with a timer deadlock if max threshold isn’t reached.

That’s how I would go about it anyway, and I’m an idiot so there might be smarter ways.

I would stagger a guess that 75% was the min threshold of whatever the expected average for 100% was. Or maybe even 50% was the minimum, to give us a fighting chance? We’d have to collectively work hard to throw a fail state I would imagine.

3 Likes

Thank you guys for taking special care with System’s memories while I was away!

I am sure they appreciate it!

9 Likes

Just like a blister I show up when the work is done, great job everybody!

7 Likes

Happy birthday, brother!

2 Likes

Always late to the party, but a great guest nevertheless :wink:

4 Likes

I’m a bit late to the party on the reply, but Happy Birthday! :partying_face:

7 Likes

All of the associated posts got kind of combined here for this one, so hopefully this makes sense to post now.

Going along the same idea as with the part of the solve for FUNDAMENTAL REALITY OF MATTER AND TIME requiring the correct Report ID, this one also has a Report ID: corrupted, so I have sent in:

To correct the Report ID as it is currently corrupted as well.

6 Likes